2022 Tesla Model Y Recalls, Ratings & Complaints

Incident: August 18, 2026 · Filed: October 30, 2026

I have noticed a warning sign and heaviness to steer wheel, also unable to use autosteer, full self driving feature. I tried to reset to see if it could fix the issue but wasn't able to. I contacted Tesla service to see if the repair would be covered by warranty but they said my car's warranty has expired. I feel like this is unfair, and it should be handled as defective issue. My car is 2022 model which it has less than 50k miles on it. I feel unsafe to drive it since the issue, electrical issue can be dangerous while on the road and Tesla should be responsible for the repaire. Please help me with this issue!

Incident: October 17, 2026 · Filed: October 21, 2026

I am reporting a safety defect on my 2022 Tesla Model Y (VIN [XXX], 70,856 miles). On XXX, I brought the vehicle to Tesla Service in [XXX] for a tire pressure alert. While performing its own service-bulletin inspection of the front and rear chassis, Tesla found that BOTH front lower lateral link assemblies require replacement and presented me with a $1,173.56 estimate, classifying the required wheel alignment as "Customer Pay." The front lower lateral link is the exact component under ODI's open Preliminary Evaluation PE26006 for 2021-2023 Model Y, involving detachment and potential loss of vehicle directional control. Both links failing simultaneously, discovered through Tesla's own bulletin inspection with no accident or impact damage, indicates premature component failure of a safety-critical steering/suspension part, not ordinary wear. Tesla has not agreed to cover this repair. The vehicle was promised back on XXX and is still not repaired. I am filing this report so the condition is documented within PE26006, and I request that NHTSA consider this case when evaluating whether the lateral link defect on 2021-2023 Model Y requires a recall. I have asked Tesla to preserve the removed parts for inspection. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

Incident: October 18, 2026 · Filed: October 19, 2026

On October 18, 2026, at approximately 3:15, I was opening the driver’s door of my 2022 Tesla Model Y, using the exterior door handle in the normal way. My left thumbnail became trapped inside the handle mechanism as it operated. The handle tore the entire thumbnail off at the nail bed, and the nail remained lodged in the handle. I had to pull the detached nail out of the handle myself. I lost consciousness briefly from the pain and blood loss. I went to the emergency room at Kaiser Permanente, where the nail bed was cleaned and the detached nail was reinserted and splinted. No stitches were required. The nail will take approximately 6-8 months to regrow. The vehicle was parked and undamaged. The handle did not malfunction in an obvious way; the injury occurred during ordinary operation. I believe the design of the recessed handle allows a fingernail to be caught between the moving handle and the door, and I am reporting this as a safety concern.

Incident: October 18, 2026 · Filed: October 18, 2026

I was using the Full Self Driving Feature on the Tesla when it began to merge into the lanes on the right and it almost hit another vehicle. Today is the second day using the FSD feature, this is the first time it does this. Prior to it merging lanes on its own, it did swerve to the right on one lane as well.

Incident: October 16, 2026 · Filed: October 16, 2026

Tesla manual States that to shift from drive to reverse all you have to do is press the stop all the way up. However while driving if you had used autopilot which is the adas system and disengaged it without hitting the brakes then the car will refuse to go into reverse contradiction to the user manual. I have almost been in numerous low-speed crashes because I pressed the stock up to go into reverse and thinking that the car will go into reverse I'm pressing the throttle again only for the car to work forward followed by a delayed sound indicating that the car didn't go into reverse. The sound he's almost always delayed.

Incident: October 7, 2026 · Filed: October 14, 2026

After making a left turn I got 2 alerts on my screen "steering assist reduced" and "lane departure disabled", I tried to reset the vehicle few times, but it didn't work, I drove it to Tesla repair center and they issued steering rack damage diagnosis, Tesla is removing and replacing the steering rack along with wheel alignment at this moment. Driving with the alert was extremely dangerous since the steering could have been completely disabled while driving and this could happen on the freeway or a busy street which would have put me and others at the risk. Since it has been a very common problem with 2022 and 2023 models and recall has been issued for 2023 models, I feel like the 2022 models having the exact same problem are being ignored and it's drivers put at a risk of hurting themselves or others.

Incident: January 15, 2026 · Filed: October 13, 2026

The contact owns a 2022 Tesla Model Y. The contact stated that the steering wheel covering delaminated and detached from the steering wheel structure. The contact indicated that while turning the steering wheel, additional effort was required to grip the wheel. Both the dealer and manufacturer were notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 72,000.

Incident: September 26, 2026 · Filed: October 12, 2026

On XXX, I was involved in a collision in [XXX], while manually driving my 2022 Tesla Model Y (VIN: [XXX]). Neither Full Self-Driving (FSD) nor Autopilot was engaged. I was making a right turn at a red traffic signal while another vehicle was making a U-turn. My Tesla collided with the passenger-side door of the other vehicle. Before the collision, I did not receive any audible or visual Forward Collision Warning (FCW). I also did not observe the Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) system activating or attempting to slow the vehicle before impact. My approximate speed at the time of the collision is unknown. No injuries occurred. I am concerned that the vehicle's Forward Collision Warning and Automatic Emergency Braking systems did not respond to the collision risk. I understand these systems have operating limitations, particularly during turning maneuvers, but I would like this incident documented as a potential vehicle safety concern. I request that NHTSA review this incident to determine whether further investigation is warranted, including whether the vehicle detected the collision risk and whether the safety systems were functioning as designed. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

Incident: September 27, 2026 · Filed: October 8, 2026

I am reporting a potentially serious tire safety failure involving a Continental ProContact RX, size 255/45R19 104W XL, installed on a 2022 Tesla Model Y. The tire was purchased new and installed by Tesla on January 15, 2026. In September 2026, while driving, the tire experienced a sudden catastrophic failure. The sidewall was extensively torn and separated circumferentially around the wheel, while substantial portions of the tread remained intact. The tire carcass was left hanging around the wheel. This was not simply a small puncture or localized cut. The incident created a significant safety concern due to the sudden loss of tire integrity while the vehicle was moving. The vehicle was subsequently towed to a Tesla service center for inspection. No resulting vehicle damage was identified, but the tire required replacement. Tesla documented tread-depth measurements of 6/32, 7/32 and 8/32. Continental subsequently declined warranty coverage, citing treadwear and reported tire-pressure concerns. However, the precise initiating cause of the catastrophic failure has not been established. Continental has now arranged for the failed tire to be returned for further technical examination, with findings expected approximately 6–8 weeks after receipt. The failed tire has been retained and is available for inspection, and extensive photographs document its condition. I am concerned that a relatively new tire could fail in this manner and request that NHTSA review this incident for any similar reports involving Continental ProContact RX tires, particularly on Tesla Model Y vehicles, and determine whether a broader safety concern exists.

Incident: October 6, 2026 · Filed: October 7, 2026

On [xxx], I brought my 2022 Tesla Model Y (VIN [XXX]), with approximately 31,000 miles, to Tesla Service in Owings Mills, Maryland. During the inspection, Tesla identified significant deterioration of the front suspension bushings. Tesla’s written estimate states: “recommend to replace lateral links and compliance links due to bushing being torn and dry rotting.” Tesla recommended replacement of the front lower lateral link assemblies and front lower compliance links. The estimated repair cost is $1,548.80. I was not aware of this condition before Tesla’s inspection. I am reporting it because deterioration of front suspension/lateral-link components could potentially affect vehicle handling or steering if the components deteriorate further or fail. Components failed/deteriorated: Tesla diagnosed the bushings as torn and dry rotting and recommended replacement of the affected front suspension links. I have not experienced an actual component detachment or complete suspension failure. Warning lights: I did not have a warning light indicating this suspension condition before Tesla’s inspection. I am aware that NHTSA has opened an investigation involving reported front lower lateral-link failures on certain 2021–2023 Model Y vehicles. I am not claiming that my vehicle has the same defect, but I want this condition documented and evaluated for possible relevance to that investigation. Tesla also verbally told me that goodwill assistance was denied because the vehicle had been driven “too little.” I asked Tesla to provide the technical basis for this explanation, including whether limited vehicle use can cause or contribute to suspension bushing deterioration. Tesla’s subsequent written response did not address this explanation and instead only stated that the vehicle’s warranty had expired based on time. I believe this information may be relevant when evaluating why these suspension components deteriorated at only approximately 31,000 miles. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)