2005 Workhorse W22 Recalls & Complaints

Incident: July 1, 2011 · Filed: February 18, 2015

THE INSTRUMENT LED STARTED TO MALFUNCTION .CAN'T READ WHAT GEAR THE MOTORHOME IS IN OR ANY OF THE OTHER FUNCTIONS THAT ARE DISPLAYED,OIL PRESSURE, LOW OIL. IT STARTED GRADUALLY NOW ITS TO THE POINT THAT YOU CAN'T READ THE DISPLAY ESPECIALLY WHAT GEAR (REVERSE .NEUTRAL,DRIVE). SOMEONE CAN GET SERIOUSLY INJURED BECAUSE OF IT, OR DESTROY THE COACH OR ENGINE BECAUSE OF NOT BEING ABLE TO READ THE MESSAGE BOARD. *TR

Incident: July 11, 2012 · Filed: August 16, 2012

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 WORKHORSE W22 RV. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH, HE SMELLED BURNING FROM THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A MECHANIC WHO STATED THAT THEY NEEDED TO REPLACE THE BRAKE CALIPER ASSEMBLIES. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND STATED THAT THE VIN WAS NOT INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 09V110000 (SERVICE BRAKES). THE FAILURE AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 25,000....UPDATED 10/17/12 *BF UPDATED 10/19/2012 *JS

Incident: March 1, 2012 · Filed: March 14, 2012

2005 WORKHORSE W22 MOTORHOME. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO RECALL CONCERNING STICKING BRAKE CALIPERS *TGW WHILE REPLACING THE CALIPERS, THE MECHANIC DISCOVERED THAT THREE OF THE BRAKE ROTORS WERE CRACKED. THE CONSUMER FELT IT WAS A PREMATURE FAILURE OF THE BRAKE ROTORS AND CONSTITUTED A SAFETY HAZARD.

Incident: October 21, 2011 · Filed: October 29, 2011

I HAD NEW TIRES PUT ON THIS MOTORHOME AND THE MECHANIC SHOWED ME FRONT ROTORS WERE BOTH CRACKED AND REMINDED ME OF THE BOSCH CALIPER RECALL. I CHECKED MY VIN # ON WORKHORSE WEB SITE AND IT SHOWED THE RECALL FOR MY CHASSIS. I TOOK IT TO BOB STALL CHEVROLET IN SAN DIEGO TO HANDLE THE RECALL. I WAS INFORMED WORKHORSE DENIED THE ROTORS WERE DAMAGED BY THE POSSIBILITY OF THE CALIPERS NOT RELEASING AND OVERHEATING AND CRACKING THE ROTORS. I HAVE NEVER EVEN SMELT HOT BRAKES ON THIS MOTORHOME SINCE I HAVE OWNED IT. I WAS SURPRISED TO SEE CRACKED ROTORS ESPECIALLY THIS SIZE OF ROTORS. I HAVE DONE ALL MY OWN VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FOR THE LAST 35 YEARS INCLUDING MANY BRAKE JOBS. I HAVE RARELY EVEN HAD TO TURN ROTORS ON ANY OF MY AUTOS,B USUALLY JUST CHANGE PADS OR SHOES. I AM EXTREMELY CONSCIOUS OF HOW I USE MY BRAKES ESPECIALLY ON THE MOTORHOME AS THIS IS MY THIRD ONE IN 20 YEARS. I HAD A BOUNDER ON A FORD CHASSIS FOR TEN YEARS PRIOR TO THIS WORKHORSE AND I CHANGED THE PADS AT 40K MILES WITH NO ISSUES WITH ROTORS OR CALIPERS. MY PROBLEM IS THAT I AM PAYING $1600.00 TO HAVE NEW ROTORS AND PADS WITH SEALS ON A 5 YEAR OLD CHASSIS. THIS IS TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE ESPECIALLY FOR SOMETHING I PAID $130,000.00 FOR. I BELIEVE THESE ROTORS WERE EITHER DAMAGED BY STICKING CALIPERS OR UNEVEN TEMPERING DURING THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS OF THESE ROTORS. *TR

Incident: May 15, 2010 · Filed: February 11, 2011

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 NATIONAL SEA BREEZE LX RV WITH A WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA ID NUMBER: 09V110000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC) AND THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED UNDER THE RECALL IN 2010. ON A LATER DATE WHILE DRIVING 65 MPH AND ENGAGING THE BRAKE, THE BRAKES AND FRONT WHEELS BEGAN TO SHAKE ABNORMALLY. IN ADDITION, THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BRAKES WOULD BECOME EXTREMELY HOT. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHERE THE CONTACT WAS ADVISED THAT THE FRONT ROTORS WERE WARPED AND THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE CONTACT STATED HE WAS HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THE REAR BRAKES NOW. THE CONTACT CALLED THE MANUFACTURER AND THE REPRESENTATIVE ADVISED HIM THAT THE FAILURE WAS CAUSED BY DRIVER ERROR. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 14,751 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 15,700.

Incident: September 1, 2009 · Filed: November 17, 2010

2005 WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. WINNEBAGO ADVENTURER. CONSUMER STATES BRAKE FAILURE *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED IN SEPTEMBER 2009 WHILE DRIVING, THE BRAKES FAILED FOR THE FIRST TIME. THE CONSUMER AND HIS WIFE BEGAN TO SMELL THE BRAKES BURNING. THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATED, THE FRONT WHEELS WERE TOO HOT TO TOUCH AND THE REAR WHEELS WERE HOT AS WELL. THE RV WAS TAKEN TO A LOCAL WORKHORSE FACILITY. THEY REPLACED A CRACKED CALIPER, BUT DID NOTHING TO THE BRAKES. IN AUGUST 2010, THE BRAKES FAILED AGAIN. THE RV WAS TOWED TO A WORKHORSE FACILITY. THEY REPLACED THE FRONT CALIPERS, FRONT CENTER CAPS AND THREE ABS SENSORS. A CLAIM WAS SUBMITTED TO WORKHORSE, BUT THE IT WAS DENIED. WORKHORSE STATED THE BRAKE FAILURE WAS NOT RECALL RELATED. *JB

Incident: September 27, 2010 · Filed: November 12, 2010

CONSUMER WRITES REGARDING 2005 WORKHORSE CHASSIS RECALL *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED WHEN HE TOOK THE RV IN FOR SERVICE, HE ADVISED THE TECHNICIAN THAT THERE WAS AN ODOR AND SMOKE COMING FROM THE BRAKE SYSTEM DURING LIGHT AND HEAVY BRAKING. AFTER INSPECTION, THE TECHNICIAN DETERMINED THE BRAKE CALIPERS WERE IN FACT DEFECTIVE. THEY ALSO DETERMINED THAT THE ROTORS WERE HEAT DAMAGED TO THE POINT THAT THE RV WAS UNSAFE TO DRIVE. ALSO, THE BRAKE PADS WERE HEAT DAMAGED AND PREMATURELY WORN OUT. THE CONSUMER STATED HE WOULD LIKE WORKHORSE TO FULFILL THEIR OBLIGATIONS REGARDING THE RECALL ON THE BOSCH BRAKE CALIPERS AND THE RESULTING DAMAGE TO THE BRAKE SYSTEM. *JB

Incident: September 28, 2010 · Filed: October 4, 2010

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 MONACO SIMBA RV EQUIPPED WITH A WORKHORSE CHASSIS W22. THERE WAS A RECALL ASSOCIATED WITH NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 09V110000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC); HOWEVER, THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED BY THE DEALER THAT THE PART NEEDED FOR RECALL REPAIRS WAS ON A MASSIVE BACKORDER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE WAS THE 144TH PERSON ON THE WAITING LIST FOR THE PART AND WAS CONCERNED WITH THE POTENTIAL SAFETY HAZARD INVOLVED BEFORE BEING ABLE TO HAVE THE VEHICLE REPAIRED. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE.

Incident: November 25, 2007 · Filed: September 27, 2010

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 MONACO MONARCH RV EQUIPPED WITH A WORKHORSE CHASSIS W22. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER FOR REPAIRS UNDER NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 09V110000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC). THE CONTACT STATED THE RECALL MENTIONED THAT THE DEALER WOULD REPLACE THE ROTORS IN CONJUNCTION TO THE FOUR BRAKE CALIPERS REPLACEMENT. THE DEALER REFUSED TO REPLACE THE OVERHEATED ROTORS UNDER THE RECALL REMEDY. THE REAR DRIVER SIDE ROTOR WAS REPLACED AT THE OWNER'S EXPENSE. THE THREE OTHER DAMAGED ROTORS WERE NOT REPLACED. IN ADDITION, THE COMPLETE BRAKE SYSTEM HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY REPLACED IN OCTOBER OF 2007. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 29,000.

Incident: August 9, 2010 · Filed: September 20, 2010

LETTER FROM CONGRESSMAN DAVIS ON BEHALF OF CONSTITUENT REQUESTING A RECALL ON HIS 2006 FLEETWOOD THAT HE PURCHASED FROM RV SERVICE & ACCESSORIES OF TENNESSEE (DOT/I 2010-2160-RESPOND TO ROCKWOOD, TN OFFICE) *TGW THE CONSUMER EXPERIENCED COMPLETE BRAKE FAILURE AT 11,990 MILES. THE CONSUMER STATED OTHER CHASSIS MODELS WERE RECALLED, BUT NOT HIS MODEL. *JB