1997 Mercury Cougar Recalls, Ratings & Complaints

Incident: June 19, 2013 · Filed: June 23, 2013

MY VEHICLES BECAME TOTALLY DISABLED ON A VERY BUSY HIGHWAY WITH HEAVY AFTER HOURS RUSH HOUR TRAFFIC. THE MANIFOLD WHICH IS MADE OF PLASTIC BROKE WERE THE COOLANT TEMPERATURE SENSOR WAS BUILT IN, I ALSO NOTICED THAT A FEW SPARKPLUGS WERE FLOODED WITH COOLANT. I FOUND OUT THAT THERE WAS A LAWSUIT ON THESE VEHICLES BUT NO ONE KNEW ABOUT IT AND ONLY FLEET VEHICLES WERE COVERED AND NOT CIVILIAN VEHICLES. I WONDER IF THERE IS ANY CHANCE FOR ME TO SEEK A DEALERSHIP AND GET REIMBURSED FOR THESE DAMAGES. *TR

Incident: May 19, 2004 · Filed: November 26, 2012

ON 5/19/2004 I HAD TO HAVE TOWED AND REPLACE DEFECTIVE CRACKED PLASTIC INTAKE MANIFOLD ON A 1997 MERCURY XR7 COUGAR AND HADN'T BEEN PREVIOUSLY INFORMED OF ANY RECALLS THEN RECENTLY I HAD TO REPLACE YET ANOTHER DEFECTIVE MANIFOLD (2ND CAR ) THIS SHOP INFORMED ME OF A CLASS ACTION THAT I SHOULD HAVE BEEN INFORMED OF PREVIOUSLY THAT SHOULD HAVE TAKEN CARE OF THE AUTO ABOVE HOWEVER AS THE NOTIFICATION PROGRAM NEVER NOTIFIED ME ON EITHER CAR. *TR

Incident: July 6, 2011 · Filed: July 11, 2011

FUEL WAS NOTED LEAKING FROM FUEL LINES JUST AFT OF THE PASSENGER SIDE DOOR. UPON FURTHER INVESTIGATION, FUEL WAS SEEM RUNNING DOWN THE FUEL LINES AND SIDE OF FUEL TANK. LEAK WAS CAUSED BY FUEL LINES CHAFFING THROUGH ON TOP OF TANK. CAR HAD 51,000 MILES ON IT. *TT

Incident: December 15, 2009 · Filed: January 30, 2010

I UNDERSTAND THERE WAS A CLASS ACTION SUIT DUE TO A FAULTY INTAKE MANIFOLD ON MANY FORD CARS WITH A 4.6 LITER ENGINE. I OR MY KIDS HAVE OWNED A 1997 MERCURY COUGAR SINCE NEW. RECENTLY THIS CAR WHICH HAD BEEN IN STORAGE FOR SEVERAL YEARS WAS GIVEN TO MY SON WHO IS LAID OFF AND ATTEMPTING TO COMPLETE HIS BACHELORS DEGREE. I SPENT MONEY TO REPAIR SENSOR, FREEZEPLUG AND HE PUT NEW TIRES ON THIS CAR. I AM WRITING BECAUSE I CONTACTED FORD ABOUT THIS DEFECTIVE INTAKE MANIFOLD PROBLEM AND WAS TOLD I WAS TOO LATE BECAUSE THE CLASS ACTION INVOLVING THE FAULTY PLASTIC INTAKE MANIFOLD HAD EXPIRED IN 2007 OR AT 75,000 MILES. THE CAR IN QUESTION HAS SLIGHTLY MORE THAN 75,000 MILES. HOW COULD I HAVE TAKEN PART IN REPAIRING OR REIMBURSEMENT OF OVER $800 I HAD TO PAY TO GET THE PLASTIC INTAKE MANIFOLD REPLACED. I THEN FOUND ON THE INTERNET THAT MANY INDIVIDUALS ARE IN THE SAME POSITION I AM IN. I FOUND THE FOLLOWING LINK ON THE INTERNET VERY INFORMATIVE AND GIVES SEVERAL EXAMPLES OF PEOPLE WITH THIS PROBLEM AND EXPLAINS SOME SAFETY ISSUES CONCERNING THIS PROBLEM BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE STILL DRIVING THESE CARS POSSIBLY NOT KNOWING THE ENGINE COULD BLOW UP AT ANY TIME IN ANY PLACE INCLUDING TRAFFIC. SEE LINK BELOW HTTP://PUBLIC.FOTKI.COM/TRSI/FORD_SUCKS/FORD_INTAKE_RECALL/MANIFOLD2.HTML CAN OR WILL YOU HELP WITH THIS PROBLEM. AT THE LEAST PEOPLE SHOULD BE MADE AWARE THAT THEIR CAR WITH THIS PLASTIC MANIFOLD COULD LEAVE THEM STRANDED IN A DANGEROUS SITUATION. THE LINK I INCLUDED DOES GIVE EXAMPLES OF WHY THIS COULD BE DANGEROUS AND INDICATES MANY PEOPLE MAY STILL BE UNAWARE THAT THIS PLASTIC MANIFOLD PROBLEM EVEN EXIST. THIS IS IMPORTANT AS AN OWNER AND TO PROSPECTIVE BUYERS OF THESE CARS AS WELL. PLEASE HELP! I JUST THINK IT IS OBVIOUS THE INTAKE MANIFOLD IS AND WAS FAULTY AND WRONG THAT THE ACTIONS WAS SETTLED AND I DID NOT EVEN KNOW ABOUT IT. I DO HAVE THE DEFECTIVE INTAKE MANIFOLD WHICH IS CRACKED AT BOTH ENDS OF THE MANIFOLD. WATER IN ENGINE BOOM! SAFETY DANGER! *TR

Incident: January 10, 2008 · Filed: January 14, 2008

INTAKE MANIFOLD CRACK AND ANTI-FREEZE SPILLING OUT AND A LOT OF STEAM SMOKE WHILE I WAS DRIVING,CAR IN SHOP NOW A IT WILL COST ME $600.00 TO FIX. *TR

Incident: March 4, 2007 · Filed: March 16, 2007

IGNITION FAILED TO TURN WITH KEY. PUT LUBRICANT (WD-40) IN HOLE AND TAPPED WITH HAMMER UNTIL KEY TURNED.

Incident: February 22, 2007 · Filed: February 23, 2007

FORD HEADLIGHTS: CLOUDY LENSES: FORD MADE AUTOS HAVE PLASTIC LENSES/HEADLIGHTS THAT CLOUD UP OVER TIME, WITHIN 5 YEARS TO 10 YEARS, THAT LIMIT EFFECTIVENESS OF THE HEADLIGHTS AT NIGHT. I PERSONALLY HAVE HIT CURBS AND NARROWLY MISSED PEDESTRIANS ETC DUE TO INABILITY TO SEE THEM AT NIGHT DUE TO LOW HEADLIGHT BRIGHTNESS. THE FORD/MERCURY DEALER INFORMS ME THAT TO REPLACE THE FOGGED LENSES, I WILL HAVE TO PAY HIM $350.00 PER HEADLIGHT FOR A WHOLE NEW ASSEMBLY. LENSES ARE NOT SOLD SEPARATELY, HE SAYS. CANNOT BE CLEANED, HE SAYS. WHY, WHY, WHY DO YOU LET FORD GET BY WITH SELLING CARS THAT HAVE THESE DEFECTIVE, PRONE TO FAILURE HEADLIGHT LENSES? PEOPLE CAN'T SEE WHERE THEY ARE GOING AT NIGHT! DOESN'T THAT CONCERN YOU? LOOK THROUGH ANY PARKING LOT, SEE THE FORD PRODUCTS WITH DARKENED, RUINED LENSES. THESE ARE ACCIDENTS WAITING TO HAPPEN TO 1000'S OF DRIVERS WHO CAN'T AFFORD $350 PER HEADLIGHT EVERY 5 YEARS OR SO! FORD SHOULD RECALL THESE CARS AND/OR OFFER REASONABLE COST REPLACEMENTS. $350 PER LENS IS NOT REASONABLE! *NM

Incident: June 25, 2001 · Filed: May 22, 2006

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

Incident: February 28, 2004 · Filed: March 31, 2006

MAKE: MERCURY MODEL: COUGAR YEAR: 1997 TYPE: PASSENGER CAR SERVICE BULLETIN NUMBER: 05N04 NHTSA ITEM NUMBER: 10018959 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION: EXTENDED COVERAGE PROGRAM 05N04 - EXTENDED COVERAGE FOR COMPOSITE INTAKE MANIFOLD. THIS PROGRAM IS BEING PROVIDED AS A SETTLEMENT TO A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT. THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT EXTEND THE COVERAGE OF THE ALL-COMPOSITE INTAKE MANIFOLD TO 7 YEARS FROM THE ORIGINAL WARRANTY START DATE OF THE VEHICLE, WITH NO LIMIT ON THE NUMBER OF MILES THAT THE VEHICLE HAS BEEN DRIVEN. *TT ON MARCH 2, 2004, I SENT A LETTER TO FORD MOTOR COMPANY DESCRIBING HOW THE INTAKE MANIFOLD ON MY 1997 MERCURY COUGAR HAD RUPTURED ON FEB. 28, 2004. AFTER WAITING A MONTH AND RECEIVING NO REPLY, I CALLED THEIR CUSTOMER COMPLAINT LINE AND DESCRIBED THE PROBLEM. THEY TOLD ME THAT MY VEHICLE DID NOT QUALIFY FOR A RECALL REIMBURSEMENT, BUT GAVE NO REASON WHY. SINCE MY DAUGHTER ALSO OWNS A 1997 MERCURY COUGAR, I TOLD HER TO HAVE A MECHANIC CHECK HER INTAKE MANIFOLD. THE MECHANIC REPLACED HER INTAKE MANIFOLD AT NO CHARGE SINCE IT HAD BEEN RECALLED AS PER THE ABOVE QUOTED STATEMENT. I CALLED FORD BACK WITH THIS INFORMATION AND THEY GAVE ME THE SAME REPLY. I WROTE THEM A LETTER AND THEY DID NOT REPLY. I VISITED MY LOCAL MERCURY DEALER, FROM WHOM I HAD RECENTLY PURCHASED A NEW VEHICLE AND AGAIN WAS TOLD THAT MY VEHICLE DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR THE RECALL. I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS CASE WENT TO COURT AND THE RULING WAS THAT FORD HAD TO PAY EVERY OWNER OF VEHICLES WITH THIS DEFECT A SUM OF $750. I HAVE NOT BEEN PAID ANYTHING AND FORD REFUSES TO GIVE ME ANY ANSWER OTHER THAN WHAT THEY HAVE ALREADY GIVEN. I STILL HAVE THE DEFECTIVE INTAKE MANIFOLD IN MY POSSESSION AND THE REPAIR BILL FOR $1455.28. *JB

Incident: August 24, 2005 · Filed: March 23, 2006

1 .HEAVY LOSS OF COOLANT,SPRAYING ALL OVER ENGINE AREA CONTINUOUSLY AND WOULD NOT MAINTAIN PROPER LEVELS. 2. CAR OVERHEATING AND RISK OF BURNING UP THE ENGINE. 3. REPLACED "PLASTIC" MANIFOLD,COOLANT,THERMOSTAT AND GASKET. THIS MANIFOLD WAS A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST FORD MOTOR COMPANY THAT I CONTACTED AFTER THE INCIDENT AND WAS TOLD MY VIN DID NOT FALL INTO THE CATEGORY. I NOW LOOKED IT UP AND IT CERTAINLY DOES. THE OUTCOME OF THE LAWSUIT HAD DATES INVOLVED AND MY INCIDENT HAPPENED SEVEN MONTHS AFTER THE JUDGES DECISION OF SEVEN YEARS AFTER THE WARRANTY. AFTER CALLING FORD AND SPEAKING WITH 3 "CUSTOMER SERVICE" PEOPLE THEIR SCRIPT WAS THE LEGAL DECISION AND THEY (FORD) WAS NOT GOING TO DO A THING FOR ME. HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE OUT THERE THAT HAD THIS HAPPEN AND HAVE NO IDEA OF THIS "PLASTIC MANIFOLD" THAT SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN IN THE CAR AND PAID GOOD MONEY FOR SOMETHING THAT FORD CAUSED AND NOW WILL NOT STAND BY THEIR PRODUCT. *JB